Thursday, June 30, 2005
God is Tough  

I am not sure that there is another way for me to say this--God is tough. I mean He is tough toward us, His creatures. Now, do not get me wrong. I believe that God is all-loving and all-merciful, but I also believe He is tough. He asks us to do things that are really difficult. He allows circumstances that seem impossible. He says that He will not give us more than we can handle, but it seems like He really pushes that to the very limit He has on what we are able to handle.

If you doubt what I am saying consider the first reading for today's mass which is from the book of Genesis. It is the story of how God asked Abraham to sacrifice his only son Isaac. (22:1b-19) The background to the story is familiar. God had promised to Abraham and Sarah that, although they were well advanced in years, they would have a son through whom numerous descendents would come. Abraham believed in God, and finally, years after the initial promise from God, Isaac was born.

After all of that, Isaac starts to grow up like any other boy. Then today's story occurs. God asks Abraham to sacrifice his son. There is no other way to view God's request other than that it is tough, really tough. Years of trusting God, believing His word, and waiting patiently are about to come crashing down around Abraham. His son is to be taken from him by his own hand. It is absolutely amazing that Scripture does not record Abraham reacting like 99% of us would. We would think that this was an insane idea, and we were certainly not going to do it. It is far too difficult. No, it is impossible. If Abraham thought that, it is not recorded in Scripture. Instead, Scripture indicates that he believed even thinking that God could raise his son from the dead.

This toughness seems to be the way that God operates. He asks us to do painful things even in the midst of the difficult trials we are already facing. Keep in mind that Abraham is on God's side. He had believed God for years even when his wife doubted that they could have a son. Abraham had demonstrated remarkable patience in waiting for the fulfillment of God's word. What does he get in return? Another test of his faith. You see the same thing in the lives of the saints. The more faithful a saint is, the more God requires from him. The closer he gets to God, the more difficult the trials in his life are. (By the way, for those who might hold to a health and wealth gospel, you are completely missing the boat. Jesus call us to take up our cross daily and follow Him. If you do that you will face very difficult things in life.)

God continues to operate like that today. He still wants us to go through awful circumstances of pain and loss. He still calls us to follow Him through fiery ordeals. For instance, as I mentioned in a previous post, the Torres family is living through an unimaginable scenario. If we look at our own lives, we are bound to find unsolicited tribulations and calls from God to follow Him in a way that we could not imagine because it is so onerous. In other words, we see in our lives that God truly is tough. He has high demands, and He wants us to live through the tough times to transform us into people who continue to believe with an even stronger faith.

Posted by David at 3:00 AM  |  Comments (0)  | Link

Wednesday, June 29, 2005
What is man's greatest desire?  

The answer to the question of man's greatest desire and the answers to many other questions based on the Catechism of the Catholic Church are included in the new Compendium of the Catechism of the Catholic Church.

Yesterday, on the eve of the Feast of Saints Peter and Paul, Pope Benedict XVI approved and presented the Compendium of the Catechism of the Catholic Church. As prefect for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, he helped to oversee the writing of this shorter form of the Catechism. Notably, the Catechism is presented in a question and answer format which for Americans will be reminiscent of the Baltimore Catechism which was written in the nineteenth century. Consequently, the more concise, question and answer format will more easily lend itself to memorization.

In the presentation, the Holy Father noted that he desired that the Compendium be given "to every person of good will, who would like to know the unfathomable riches of the salvific mystery of Jesus Christ."

Sample questions include: [Translations provided by Zenit.]

23. What unity is there between the Old and New Testaments?

Scripture is one, as the Word of God is one; the salvific plan of God is one, the divine inspiration of both Testaments is one. The Old Testament is a preparation for the New, and the New is the fulfillment of the Old: both illuminate one another mutually.

482. What is required for peace in the world?

It requires the just distribution and protection of the goods of people, free communications between human beings, respect for the dignity of persons and peoples, [and] the assiduous practice of justice and fraternity.

533. What is man's greatest desire?

Man's greatest desire is to see God. This is the cry of his whole being: "I want to see God!" Man attains his authentic and full happiness in the vision and the blessedness of the One who created him out of love and attracts him to Himself by his infinite love.

This last answer alone is worth its own meditation.


Posted by David at 8:45 AM  |  Comments (1)  | Link

Tuesday, June 28, 2005
I cannot imagine  

Perhaps you have heard of the very tragic story regarding Susan Torres, the 26-year-old pregnant woman who collapsed on May 7th of this year because she was suffering from stage 4 melanoma. The melanoma had attacked the top of her spinal column, and although she was rushed to a hospital, she has since been declared brain dead. Legally speaking, by the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, she is no longer alive.

At the time she was 17 weeks pregnant with their second child. Now, she is being kept alive in the hope that her unborn child will be able to be delivered. Her husband Jason Torres, also 26 years of age, has firmly declared that this would be her wish. Both he and his wife are Catholics. His wife is a convert to Catholicism. Jason has indicated that he has struggled with all of this with God in prayer including yelling at God. However, he makes the point he does not see that as a problem because he is keeping the dialogue open.

Doctors have placed his wife on the necessary equipment including a ventilator that will continue to supply his wife and her child with what they need to keep the child alive and growing. The situation is delicate because of the condition of Susan Torres and the fact that the cancer continues to attack her body. Fortunately, because the baby's system is somewhat separate from the mother's, there is a level of protection for the child from the cancer.

The doctors are hoping to let the child mature until the 25th week of pregnancy, which would be in two weeks, before attempting to deliver the child. Jason Torres would opt to let the child live longer in the mother's womb before attempting delivery in order to give the child the best opportunity of being healthy and avoiding all the possible problems that a prematurely born child might have.

In what must be an unbelievably difficult time, Jason Torres continues to, as he puts it, plod along. His brother is helping him to deal with all of the logistical details including the mounting medical bills. A fund has been set up to allow people to donate to help cover the now hundreds of thousands of dollars that have been incurred. Although Susan Torres had medical insurance, there is a question of what will be covered given that she is legally considered to no longer be alive. To this point, the insurance company seems to be giving the Torres family a break.

In recent days, Jason has seen a sonogram of their child which showed that the child had grown and was kicking. The family has also been encouraged by the well wishes, prayers, and donations. They have literally heard from around the world including from one person who sent a first class relic of Blessed Mother Theresa. All of this is encouraging to the family who are under such strain, especially Jason. For now, he continues to pray, to give interviews, to stay by his wife and child's side, and to hope.

[Based on a June 27, 2005 article in the Washington Post]

I really cannot imagine what this must be like for Jason Torres. The idea that he is yelling at God is probably understated. I do not know what I would do, but I do know what I can do for this young man who is bearing such a heavy burden. He needs prayers, "offerings up" to God, and, yes, money. For more information about the situation and information about how to donate, go to the Susan M. Torres Fund web site.

Posted by David at 3:15 AM  |  Comments (0)  | Link

Monday, June 27, 2005
Closed Doors  

Our daughter has been able to crawl for a couple of months. If you want to know what fast is, watch a determined child crawl for the object of her desire. I really had no idea that a baby could move that fast.

My wife and I have had to baby-proof a number of items around the house. We also will close doors and put up a gate at the bottom of one of the stairs to prevent our daughter from hurting herself.

Sometimes we will find ourselves closing the door even as our daughter is quickly crawling toward the room. Or maybe after carrying her, we will have put her on the floor in the hallway and she will kneel in the curious way she does with one leg out to the side. With her sweet smile, she begins to consider her options including the door which is slightly cracked open. Quickly we will close the door, and then she will cry out with the frustrated cry that signals she knows that she is being denied access. Her options have been limited by one because the door to that room has been closed. If she is really upset, we will have to distract her with a toy or some other object which takes her mind off of her frustration.

Although the analogy seems simple, I think it is very profound. Is not this the way that our Heavenly Father acts? He closes doors that we considered to be viable options, and we often get upset. Sometimes we get so upset that He has to "distract" us with something else. Like our daughter, we have such a limited perspective. If we left the door open or did not put up the gate at the bottom of the stairs, she might easily injure herself. God sees the danger that awaits us, and He closes the door or puts up a gate. It is simple trust in Him that enables us to accept His will and not put up a fuss.
Amen, I say to you: Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a child shall not enter into it. (Lk:18:17)
All the credit for this insight goes to my very wonderful and wise wife who made this observation to me last night.

Posted by David at 1:45 AM  |  Comments (0)  | 

Our Lady and the Church  


On Catholic Analysis, Oswald Sobrino has a nice review of Our Lady and the Church by Hugh Rahner, S.J. The book is a reprint from Zaccheus Press of a work which the then Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger described as, "one of the most important theological rediscoveries of the twentieth century." After reading the review of the book, I am definitely considering purchasing a copy.

Posted by David at 1:00 AM  |  Comments (0)  | Link

Sunday, June 26, 2005
Cross Bearing  

In today's Gospel reading from St. Matthew, Jesus states, "and whoever does not take up his cross and follow after me is not worthy of me." (10:38) This is the first time in Matthew's Gospel that Jesus uses the word cross. It is said in the context of our Lord's instructions to the Twelve whom He is sending "to drive [unclean spirits} out and to cure every disease and every illness" (10:1).

What is the cross, but the will of God? It was the Father's will that His Son suffer and die on the cross. When Christ asked His disciples to take up the cross (daily, in St. Luke's account) and follow Him, He was asking His disciples to do God's will. In verse 39, He continues, "Whoever finds his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it."

The cross in the First Century was an ignominious punishment. It was primarily used to punish those who rebelled against the Romans. It would be as if Christ asked us to take up our electric chairs and follow him. We do not think of "respectable" people being put to death via the electric chair. Yet this is Christ's call to us: to want to follow Him out of love such that we would be willing to be fools for Christ who die seemingly disrespectful deaths.

Also, the context of Christ's call makes it clear that it is part of His mission. In St. Matthew's Gospel, Jesus makes this statement as part of His instructions to the Twelve whom He has just selected and is sending out to the lost sheep of Israel (10:1-6). By choosing twelve men, Jesus is making it clear that He is reconstituting Israel's twelve tribes who had been scattered. The Church is that reconstitution of Israel, and the Twelve and their successors are the leaders of this new Israel.

What does that mean for us? I believe that to do God's will is a moment-by-moment attempt to love God. He wants us to spend every moment doing exactly what is His Will. This is not a puppeteer trying to control a puppet. It is like a father who wants his child doing what is right and best for them at all times. There are not times that a good father wants his child to do something that is wrong. It is the same with our God who is Infinite Love. Doing His will is part of a relationship in which we learn from Him what His will is and we strive to do it even in the smallest things, such as writing a comment or a post.

Neither is it a salvation by works idea. Again, in the idea of a loving relationship, the child who loves his parent seeks to imitate the parent. If the child knows he is loved, he has the freedom to do what is right and even fail in doing what is right without fear of not being loved. However, out of love, the child wants to amend what is wrong and do the right thing. The love of the relationship is what drives the child to do what is right.

By telling us it is a cross, Jesus is merely making it very clear how difficult it really is to lose our life and for Him and the Gospel. However, as others have noted, He gives us the grace to do it, and it is only be His grace that we can do it.

Posted by David at 8:45 AM  |  Comments (0)  | Link

Saturday, June 25, 2005
Blogger Blues  

Yesterday morning (early), I found that there was a problem with the way that the posts were being display. I had been making a change to the template so I naturally assumed that I had caused the problem.

The danger of having some programming knowledge is that you may try to fix things when it would be best to leave well enough alone. As it turned out, I spent quite some time trying to find what was causing the formatting error. Although I located the problem, I had no idea why some extra tag was being added to the content of the post. I assumed that the blog host Blogger was doing this, but there was no way of knowing whether this had always been the case, and I still had made some change that was causing the error.

Finally, I learned from another forum that others who had not altered their template were finding strange formatting problems. Relief. I could stop working on the problem and start putting together a work-around. (I assumed that it would be some time before Blogger would correct the oversight.) I have implemented a work-around which is rather pathetic, but it works nonetheless.

The frustration which I felt is certainly not directed at Blogger. I am all too familiar with the modification to software which has unintended results. The efforts were well-intentioned, although the work was probably not thoroughly tested. No, actually I am rather annoyed with myself. I let my self get in the way of what I probably should have been doing. I have a hunch that if I had prayed about whether I needed to spend time trying to fix the "problem" I introduced, I would have spent the time in a somewhat different manner. It really is those little prayers that make a difference.

sine intermissione orate (1 Thess. 5:17)

Posted by David at 7:00 AM  |  Comments (0)  | 

Friday, June 24, 2005
A Saint for the Disabled  

June 23rd is the feast day of St. Joseph Cafasso. He was born in Italy in 1811. He was born with a curvature in his spine which resulted in his short stature. Despite his disability he was ordained a priest, and he became a successful teacher, preacher, confessor, and reformer.

He was well-known as a confessor who was loving, gentle, and able to apply the perfect salve to the penitent's wound. St. John Bosco met St. Joseph when he was a seminarian. He was a great influence on St. John Bosco encouraging him to work with the youth and to found the Salesians.

He is the patron of prisoners because of his life-long work with prisoners. He strove to bring reform to prisons, and he ministered to many prisoners including sixty men who he accompanied to their public execution. Through his love for the men, he was able to help bring them to repentance. Consequently, he referred to these men as his "hanged saints".

He died in Turin on June 23, 1860. His friend St. John Bosco gave the homily at his funeral mass. He was canonized by Pope Pius XII in 1947.

St. Joseph Cafasso never let his disability hinder him from the work which God gave him as a priest. It would have been easy for him to feel sorry for himself or the accept the derision of people. Instead he accepted God's call to the priesthood, and he flourished in his vocation. He wrote about the priesthood:
Who is this man who in the world is called an ecclesiastic, a priest? Who is this personage whom some bless and others curse? Who is he whom the whole world talks about and criticizes, and who is the subject of discussion by all pens and all tongues? What is the significance of that name which resounds in every corner of the world? What is a priest? In order to define clearly what he is, I shall avail myself of the distinctions that St. Bernard made concerning ecclesiastics and shall consider him in his nature, in his person, in his habits. Quid in natura, quis in persona, qualis in moribus! In his nature he is a man like others. In his person, his dignity is above that of all other men in the world. In his conduct and habits, he should be a man totally different from all others as he is by his dignity and office. These are the three points which I propose for your consideration.
He is a testimony to us all that we should bear our crosses with love, and not let a disability prevent us from answering God's call upon our lives.

Posted by David at 2:45 AM  |  Comments (0)  | Link

Thursday, June 23, 2005
What the Grave Marker Really Says  

On Monday, June 20th, Michael Schiavo had Terri Schiavo's cremated remains buried at a cemetery in Clearwater, Florida. A grave stone marks the spot of her burial. The grave stone carries two interesting pieces of information. First, it indicates that Terri "departed this earth" on February 25, 1990 which is the date that she had her collapse that left her disabled. The grave stone also lists that she was "at peace" on March 31, 2005 which is the day she actually died due to dehydration. In addition, Michael had the words "I kept my promise" engraved on the head stone.

The strange use of the dates points to the real problem that Terri Schiavo had and that all other disabled people face. Someone wants to dictate when their lives should end. In the opinion of many, a severely disabled person has already "departed this earth." They are no longer around. Consequently, it is perfectly acceptable to finish off their existence by taking their lives. After all, only a cruel person would want someone to continue living who has been deemed to no longer actually be alive.

The fact that Michael Schiavo added the phrase "I kept my promise" to the grave stone indicates how defensive he really is. Perhaps I am horribly mistaken, but it seems that most grave markers which have inscriptions on them include words that are related to the person who is buried. Instead, Michael Schiavo uses the burial of Terri Schiavo to defend the killing of his wife by his pathetic justification that he kept some promise he had made to Terri regarding her alleged end-of-life wishes. It is comical at best to see someone have his defense permanently engraved on the grave stone of the person he murdered. Rather, his action is deranged and illustrates the inherent contradiction of his actions and his supposed concern for Terri.

Of course, Michael Schiavo does not think that he helped to murder his wife. Instead, he believes that some conversation with his Terri about end-of-life issues had occurred and that she would want to be put to death by any means rather than receive medical care which might aid in her rehabilitation. Consequently, he kept his promise to her by seeing to it that she stopped living in such a state.

The very obvious problems with this assertion is that it runs contrary to Michael Schiavo's own testimony and actions. In 1992, during the malpractice suit against Terri's doctors, he testified
"I believe in the vows that I took with my wife. Through sickness, in health, for richer or poorer. I married my wife because I love her and I want to spend the rest of my life with her. I'm going to do that."
Apparently, after winning a settlement in this trial, his promise switched from keeping his wedding vows to ensuring that Terri stopped living. Notably, it was not until after the settlement was awarded that Michael Schiavo remembered what Terri's end-of-life wishes were.

The grave marker over the place where Terri Schiavo's remains were interred stands as an ironic reminder of what actually happened to Terri Schiavo. Michael Schiavo was allowed to murder Terri simply because he indicated that this would have been her wish. Logically, what was allowed to occur makes no sense. The obvious contradiction of Michael's own story regarding what Terri wanted was ignored in order to allow him to "keep his promise." And in the end, the grave marker does not stand as a testimony to Terri, but a reminder to all that really Terri's murder was all about what Michael wanted and was allowed to do. God forbid that we continue to allow others similarly "to keep their promises."

Posted by David at 5:30 AM  |  Comments (1)  | Link

Wednesday, June 22, 2005
What is inside the Catholic Insider?  

If you have not heard of the podcasting priest from the Netherlands, than you need to check out the Catholic Insider. Fr. Roderick Vonhoegen is a Catholic priest from the Archdiocese of Utrecht who provides podcasts to over 2000 subscribers.

The episodes are always entertaining mixes of faith, Church and local history, real life situations, contemporary music (from www.garageband.com), and his exploration of various topics of interest including movies. He presents "soundseeing" tours in which he is the tour guide who describes what he is observing in order that you are able to share in the experience. He also seems to get around quite a bit. He was in Rome for the death of John Paul the Great, and he was also in the Eternal City for the election and installation of Benedict XVI. Once again, this week he is back in Rome where he visited the burial site of the only Dutch pope, Hadrian VI, and he will attend the Holy Father's Wednesday audience.

The shows are of a wonderful quality which shows that Fr. Roderick puts in quite a bit of post-production work. With the frequency of his podcasts and his maintaing his web site along with all of his official priestly duties, I do not know if he has time to sleep.

Posted by David at 1:45 AM  |  Comments (0)  | Link

Tuesday, June 21, 2005
Praying the Golden Rule  

Tucked into the middle of today's Gospel reading from St. Matthew--a reading in this twelfth week of ordinary time--is the Golden Rule. Jesus says, "So whatever you wish that men would do to you, do so to them; for this is the law and the prophets." (7:12)

It is interesting how He ends this by noting that what He just said sums up the law and the prophets which is a shorthand way of referring to the Hebrew Scriptures or what Christians call the Old Testament. In other words, if you want to summarize Old Testament teaching, you can put it quite succinctly in stating that you should do for others as you want them to do for you.

Often in the Old Testament, when this teaching has been stated explicitly it has been stated in the negative. For example, Tobit gives the following advice to his son Tobias, "And what you hate, do not do to any one." (Tobit 4:15) This is the so-called Silver Rule which is to do no harm. However, Jesus gives us the positive form of this idea. He makes it active. It is not enough to avoid doing harm. We must actively do good.

The other interesting idea about this instruction from our Lord is the context in which it is given. As St. Matthew records it, Jesus states the Golden Rule after speaking about prayer and how our Heavenly Father will give good things to those who ask Him. He illustrates this by mentioning that although we are evil, we will give to our children something good rather than something evil when they ask for something good. Jesus sums this up by using a rabbinical phrase to indicate that the Father will do even much more, "How much more will your Father who is in Heaven give good things to those who ask Him!" (7:11) (See Romans 5:15-17 for an example of St. Paul using the same rhetorical device.)

The connection seems to be that the Golden Rule flows from prayer; it is a fruit of our prayer life. We are to pray for what we need, and we can trust that because our Father in Heaven is truly good, we will receive what we need. However, we are to ask, seek, and knock (7:7). By repeating this idea three times with slightly different words, Jesus indicates that we must persevere in our prayer. Then by adding the Golden Rule, he makes it clear that our prayer should result in our action to do good to others. In addition, our prayers will begin to change from prayers simply for ourselves (which often can be the case even we are praying for someone else) to prayers for others which are truly intercessory. They will be intercessory because they are based on the Heart of Christ. Through our persevere, we will grow in our familiarity with the Lord and our hearts will become like unto His. Then our prayers will flow from and to His Sacred Heart.

Also, our prayer life will inform of us how we are to do good to others. You might think to yourself, "I have no idea what to do for this particular person. Clearly God has put this person in my life, but they are annoying or I am simply bothered by having to think about them. What in the world should I do?" If we take it to the Lord, we can trust that He will give us what we need to be practitioners of the Golden Rule especially when it is difficult for us because of our weaknesses and faults. Thus, Jesus is able to state the Old Testament Silver Rule in a positive, active way as the Golden Rule. He knows that we will need grace to be able to put into practice what He teaches. And it is through prayer (especially the sacraments) that we receive the grace we need to pray the Golden Rule.

Posted by David at 3:30 AM  |  Comments (0)  | Link

Monday, June 20, 2005
Here Today, Split Tomorrow  

I recently read a post on a blog, which I had never read before, that perked my interest because it described a man's negative reaction to the Journey Home program on EWTN. Now, I am a great fan of this program on which the host, Marcus Grodi, talks with his guests about their journey into the Catholic Church. Part of the reason that I like the show is because, like many people, I enjoy hearing conversion stories. Of course, the topic of the show also appeals to me because I, too, am a convert to the Catholic Church.

The guests on the show have come from diverse spiritual backgrounds that include high Anglican, mainline Protestant, Buddhist, evangelical Protestant, atheist, or even no spiritual affiliation. Consequently, during the show, the guest will talk a bit about how the theological views that he used to hold as a member of some previous religion, Christian denomination, or philosophical school of thought. This is the area that rubbed the viewer the wrong way. My understanding is that he is Catholic and his wife is not. The guest on the show he watched was from the same denominational background as his wife. I think I remember the denomination, but for the sake of this post I will say the guest had a Methodist background. The viewer turned off the television in disgust when he perceived that the guest was not correctly portraying the theology of Methodists.

Now it is commendable that the viewer was being sensitive for his wife's sake (who may have been watching the show or not, I do not remember). However, in terms of his problem with the guest on the show, his concern is almost absurd. In the first place, it is ridiculous to get upset that someone is not accurately portraying the correct Methodist theology. The fact is the person is simply conveying his understanding of Methodist theology. After all, it is the guest's journey which is the focus of the show. It is not a question of whether the guest would be able to pass a quiz on theology either Methodist or Catholic.

However, the real problem with the viewer's issue is much more troubling. The fact is that it is almost impossible for someone to say that this or that is Methodist theology. (Now I have picked Methodist, but you can substitute any Protestant denomination such as Baptist, Presbyterian, Episcopalian, etc.) The fact is there is no way to really make such a statement. There are so many branches of every single one of the major denominations of Protestantism which have vastly different theological positions. Why are there so many branches? Primarily because when a disagreement over a doctrinal issue occurred, the result was one party in the disagreement left and started another branch of the denomination. Yet, they may all claim to be the "real" branch of Methodism. (Of course, this applies not just to Methodist, but Presbyterians, Baptists, etc.) Consequently there are tens of thousands of Protestant denominations.

Without a central authority who is responsible for maintaining the deposit of faith, there really is no way to keep together a denomination. It is too easy for the disgruntled party to leave in a huff, head down the street a few blocks, and start up a new branch of Methodism. For all the viewer knew, the guest on the show was correctly espousing the theological positions of his branch of Methodism. It may not be the same as the viewer's wife's branch of Methodism, but that is the nature of the Protestant denominations. Each is its own separate entity which can define its own doctrine based on its interpretation of Scripture. Given human nature, the result is multiplication by division.

Posted by David at 8:30 AM  |  Comments (0)  | 

Sunday, June 19, 2005
Be not afraid  

The phrase most commonly associated with John Paul the Great is "Be not afraid" which he proclaimed on many occasions. In fact, in his first address after his election on October 16, 1978, he said, "Be not afraid. Open wide the doors to Christ." These words became a theme throughout his pontificate. As the Vicar of Christ, it is not surprising that He would take our Lord's words and apply them to today's world. Consequently, John Paul the Great urged us to heed the words of our Lord who on several occasions found it necessary to exhort the disciples to not be afraid. One of those times is recorded in today's Gospel reading from Matthew 10:26-33.

Three times, Jesus encourages the disciples to not be afraid:
Jesus said to the Twelve:
"Fear no one.
Nothing is concealed that will not be revealed,
nor secret that will not be known.
What I say to you in the darkness, speak in the light;
what you hear whispered, proclaim on the housetops.
And do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul;
rather, be afraid of the one who can destroy
both soul and body in Gehenna.
Are not two sparrows sold for a small coin?
Yet not one of them falls to the ground without your Father's knowledge.
Even all the hairs of your head are counted.
So do not be afraid; you are worth more than many sparrows.
Everyone who acknowledges me before others
I will acknowledge before my heavenly Father.
But whoever denies me before others,
I will deny before my heavenly Father."
These are words that He is speaking to the disciples after He has called the Twelve and He is preparing to send them out like "sheep among the wolves." (10:16) However, the point is that they should not fear to proclaim the Good News even among the wolves because the wolves cannot destroy their souls even if they are able to destroy their bodies. If they speak the truth which Jesus teaches them, they are acknowledging the Truth, and He will acknowledge them before the Father. If in this life, they must sacrifice their bodies for the sake of acknowledging Christ, their souls will be saved. It is interesting to note that of the Twelve, according to tradition, all but St. John (and Judas) met violent martyrdoms. Each of these martyrs was required to sacrifice his body for the sake of proclaiming Christ.

I hope and pray that the U.S. bishops who are wrapping up their meeting in Chicago reflect upon this Gospel reading. As successors to the apostles, they are called to "speak in the light" and "proclaim on the housetops" the fullness of the Faith. We who are lay people are also called to be faithful speakers of the truth. How can we do it? By not being afraid because we can fully trust in the One who knows even the number of hairs on our heads.

Posted by David at 3:30 AM  |  Comments (1)  | Link

Saturday, June 18, 2005
In Conversation with God  

I have been thinking about prayer based on some recent posts by The Heart of a Seminarian:

At the heart of the Catholic Faith is prayer. Through prayer we encounter God. The Infinite Being Who has existed from all time desires to have a relationship with each one of us. The means by which we have that relationship is prayer. Essentially it is a conversation with God. In His mercy, He allows an exchange to take place with Him at the level with which we are comfortable. If we are close to Him, the conversation is intimate. If we are angry with Him, it tends to be a very one-sided conversation. If we have sinned, we might be distant although He is ready to welcome our return.

God longs to speak with us. Yes, He really longs to talk to you and to me. He created us simply in order that He might love us. That love is manifest through our relationship with Him. We are the only ones who are able to frustrate that love. How do we frustrate it? We change the level of prayer. At one extreme, we can cut off the communication by serious sin or by never praying. Never praying would be never thinking of God or never trying to listen to Him. We can also frustrate His love by only approaching Him when we need something from Him like He is a distant rich uncle with influence.

In order to help us to pray, He has given us many things to help us. The most important aid is the liturgy, particularly the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. Through the mass, we are able to participate in the Heavenly Banquet of the Bridegroom and His Bride who is the Church. Through the Eucharist, we receive the grace we need to overcome ourselves, particularly the parts of us that want to frustrate God's love penetrating into our hearts.

As we grow in our relationship with God, we grow in our appreciation of the mass and its deep prayerfulness. We also have the liturgy of the hours, devotions, litanies, novenas, relics, prayer cards, and the saints. All of this is directed by God to bring us into conversation with Him. He loves us so much that He will call to us in so many ways that He knows touches our heart. He appeals to us through these prayer aids in order that we might draw closer to Him and really develop a loving relationship with Him.

When I think of Who God is, I am truly amazed at how much He loves us. He really loves us. Then I think of how little I love Him. And then I realize it is because I have a miserable relationship with Him. I think about Him in all of the wrong ways. He wants to love me, and I want Him for what He can do for me. He wants to love me, and I want to talk with Him when it is convenient. He wants to love me, and I keep telling him later will be more convenient.

Well, later probably will not be more convenient. What about praying now?

Posted by David at 1:00 AM  |  Comments (2)  | Link

Friday, June 17, 2005
Schindler Family Responds to Coroner's Report  

The Schindler family has responded to the autopsy report on Terri:
First, the IME's report confirms Terri's physical condition and disability. We all knew Terri was seriously brain-injured before the IME report. This is nothing new. The IME's report also confirms that TERRI WAS NOT TERMINAL. THAT TERRI HAD NO LIVING WILL, THAT TERRI HAD A STRONG HEART, and THAT TERRI WAS BRUTALLY DEHYDRATED TO DEATH.

Second, our family would encourage the media to remember that this case was allegedly about "Terri's choice." There is absolutely no evidence that Terri wanted to die of dehydration, or that she believed that the level of one's disability gives anyone the moral and legal right to end another's life.

Third, the IME said clearly that dehydration, not her brain injury, was the cause of her death. Terri was dehydrated to death before our eyes The moral shame of what happened is not erased because of Terri's level of disability. No one would say that "blind people" or "brain-injured" people should be put to death. That would be an irresponsible and heartless position to take. Tragically, that is what happened to Terri. As a society, it seems that we have lost our compassion for the disabled.

-- Terri had a strong heart according to the IME. In addition to her strong heart, Terri also demonstrated a very strong will to live.
Click here for the complete article.

The response by the family also includes many other concerns which the coroner's report raised regarding how Terri Schiavo ended up with a brain injury. However, the simple truth that continues to be demonstrated even by this autopsy is that Ms. Schiavo was put to death. A mentally-disabled woman with a family who was very ready to care for her was cruelly dehydrated to death simply because her estranged husband wanted her to die.

One of the most disturbing items about what happened to her is that no one was able to prevent her very public death. This crime was committed in the open, and no one was able to stop the perpetrators. Although she was innocent of any crime, the legal system, which should have protected her, gave numerous affirmations to her death sentence. The legislature and the governor had the courage to act once to save her life, but they lacked the preseverance and the genuine concern for Terri Schiavo to act a second time to save her life. Congress, too, acted boldly by passing legislation in record time, but they failed to have the strength to follow-up when the legislation was ignored along with their subpoenas. Even the President might have been able to act, but the political stakes were too high for him to take such a risk.

Keep in mind, this did not occur in some dark alley. No, this was a very public murder. By being public, it gave a tremendous amount of support for the euthanasia supporters. After all, if a mentally-disabled woman can be publicly dehydrated to death, why can't we all quietly take the lives of family members who have become too much of a burden for us. All you have to do is convince maybe a few people that it would be your relative's wish to suffer for several days without water and then die.

This leads me another disturbing item about Ms. Schiavo's death which is the universal agreement that mentally-disabled people like Terri Schiavo would not suffer because they do not feel anything. If you have ever been around people in a hospital, you know that people are able to sense things even when it seems that could not possibly be aware of their surroundings. In addition, there have been people who have recovered from diagnosed PVS who have made it clear that they felt what was being done (or not being done) to them.

The Schindler family makes the point that it should have been unnecessary to administer morphine to Terri Schiavo as she died if she felt no pain as was claimed by those who were seeking to put her to death. Yet morphine was given to her as the coroner's report indicates. The fact is that even for people who might actually be clinically diagnosed as PVS, which Terri Schiavo was not, we just cannot know for certain that a person does not feel anything.

Finally, a third disturbing item about Ms. Schiavo's death is the fact that she is actually dead. The finality of her death seems to be completely lost on all supporters of euthanasia. They act as if death is not permanent. The reality is that Ms. Schiavo's family (father, mother, brother, and sister) will never see Terri again on earth. She obviously wanted to see them over these many years because she kept fighting despite the tremendous opposition to her obvious will to live.

I feel very sorry for the family of Terri Schiavo who loved her deeply. They have gone through an absolutely hellish ordeal. Unfortunately, their trials are not over. In fact they may never be over because they will always remember that Terri was killed as they stood by helplessly, and no one else was able to prevent her death.

Posted by David at 3:00 AM  |  Comments (0)  | Link

The Sacred Heart of Jesus  

Sacred Heart


The month of June is dedicated to the Sacred Heart of Jesus.

Promises of the Sacred Heart of Jesus

Of the many promises Our Lord Jesus Christ did reveal to Saint Margaret Mary in favor of souls devoted to His Sacred Heart the principal ones are as follows:

1. I will give them all the graces necessary for their state of life.
2. I will give peace in their families.
3. I will console them in all their troubles.
4. I will be their refuge in life and especially in death.
5. I will abundantly bless all their undertakings.
6. Sinners shall find in my Heart the source and infinite ocean of mercy.
7. Tepid souls shall become fervent.
8. Fervent souls shall rise speedily to great perfection.
9. I will bless those places wherein the image of
My Sacred Heart shall be exposed and venerated.
10. I will give to priests the power to touch the most hardened hearts.
11. Persons who propagate this devotion shall have their names eternally written in my Heart.
12. In the excess of the mercy of my Heart, I promise you that my all powerful love will grant to all those who will receive Communion on the First Fridays, for nine consecutive months, the grace of final repentance: they will not die in my displeasure, nor without receiving the sacraments; and my Heart will be their secure refuge in that last hour.

Posted by David at 2:00 AM  |  Comments (0)  | Link

Thursday, June 16, 2005
Autopsy Report for Terri Schiavo Reveals the Obvious  

The autopsy report on Terri Schiavo only reports the obvious fact that a disabled woman was dehydrated to death. With regard to the unanswered questions regarding her initial collapse, the report only indicated that Ms. Schiavo did not appear to suffer from an eating disorder as was alleged by Michael Schiavo and considered a fact by many courts. The report also indicated that there were no signs of abuse on her body.

Regardless of whether Michael Schiavo was the cause of her collapse or not, he certainly was heavily responsible for her death. His demonic bent on insisting that it was Ms. Schiavo's wish that she be denied food and water, which was supported by numerous lawyers and judges, drove Ms. Schiavo to her death. There really is no question of whether this was her wish or not. Although it is clear that it was not her wish and that Mr. Schiavo conveniently "remembered" her wish after receiving a monetary settlement, Ms. Schiavo's death is simply the result of an immoral act.

The problem which has come to light in this case is that for a majority of people what was done to Ms. Schiavo is completely acceptable. There seem to be several levels of acceptance. First, there are the right-to-die advocates who range from the naive to the evil. They consciously support euthanasia which is really a euphemism for killing people who have been deemed unnecessary.

The second group of people seems to be quite large because they have personal experience in situations similar to Ms. Schiavo. It was remarkable to me how many people came out during the height of the coverage of Terri Schiavo's murder who noted that "just last week my family and I had to make a similar decision." When the person gave the details of "the decision", it became clear that it essentially was a decision that Aunt Susan really should not live any longer and that it was fine to deny her some form of ordinary care. In other words, to a greater or lesser degree, these folks had done something similar as to what happened to Ms. Schiavo except there was no media glare and perhaps only a perfunctory review by a medical ethics committee as opposed to a court case. Most of the people in this group seem to really be simply ignorant of what is happening and they have a naive trust in medical personnel who unfortunately seem only too willing to help terminate a person's life.

The last group of people are those approach this issue with an apathy that really amounts to tacit approval of what was done to Ms. Schiavo. Most of this was characterized by statements which indicated that, "Surely Michael Schiavo would know Ms. Schiavo's wishes and that it really was not the business of Ms. Schiavo's family or the courts to be involved in this 'private' matter." I could not tell whether the people who made these statements were just lazy and went with the status quo or whether they had their heads in the sand.

All three of these positions are, of course, very disturbing. However, it is not position one, but positions two and three that are the most troubling. Position one is the expected completely opposite position from one which respects human dignity no matter a person's condition. Position two shows the widespread effect that the right-to-die supporters of position one have had over the last several decades. If you doubt that, check out how many states consider food and hydration to be "medical treatments" or how many states allow doctors to ignore the wishes, written or otherwise, of patients. Finally, position three shows that much of the battle has been won by pro-death advocates because the default position of many people seems to be in favor of allowing someone to be dehydrated to death. If a person does not have a strong opinion on the issue, more likely than not they will side with the right-to-die group.

This majority support for euthanasia is born out by survey research which I included in an earlier post. That post noted that a Gallup poll had found 75% of Americans in favor of euthanasia with Evangelicals (61%), Weekly Churchgoers (51%), and self-described conservatives (63%) having majorities in support of euthanasia. The upshot seems to be that Ms. Schiavo's death was simply another loudly proclaimed victory for the right-to-die movement. Those who respect human dignity, have a large, uphill battle ahead of them.

Posted by David at 2:15 AM  |  Comments (0)  | Link

Wednesday, June 15, 2005
Pontifical Council for Peace and Justice praises cancellation of $40B debt  

In a very good move, which was lauded by the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, the G8 nations have agreed to cancel about $40 billion in debt owed by 18 of the poorest nations (Benin, Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guyana, Honduras, Madagascar, Mali, Mauritania, Mozambique, Nicaragua, Niger, Rwanda, Senegal, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia). In addition, there are plans to include 20 other nations in some type of debt cancellation.

In its statement regarding the debt cancellation, the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace called for the money to be used for development:
"However, the pontifical council also calls for the money that will now be freed to be used to bring about real and sustainable development opportunities to the people of those countries. This can be accomplished through providing necessary public goods such as clean water, safe sanitation, basic health care and educational opportunities.

"The decision to forgive the debts of those countries and move toward furthering the debt forgiveness for others is a clear sign of the solidarity that people of developed nations must have for those living in developing countries.

"It is the responsibility of the governments of all nations to continue to work toward achieving the promises that have been made over the past 30 years. This includes the commitment to provide 0.7% of the GDP of developed countries as Official Development Assistance to developing countries."

"The promise was made but only a small fraction of that money has ever been provided," indicated the Vatican statement. "This is the sort of program that should go hand in hand with debt relief. It is not enough to simply wipe away the debt. An increase in development aid should follow."
One can hope that the G8 listens to the suggestion and provides these developing nations with real aid which, as was noted, has been promised.

The Catechism makes it clear the duty that is owed to poorer nations by wealthier nations:
Rich nations have a grave moral responsibility toward those which are unable to ensure the means of their development by themselves or have been prevented from doing so by tragic historical events. It is a duty in solidarity and charity; it is also an obligation in justice if the prosperity of the rich nations has come from resources that have not been paid for fairly.(2439)

The efforts of poor countries working for growth and liberation must be supported.(2440)


Of course, John Paul the Great, of happy memory, called for, especially during the Jubilee Year of 2000, the cancellation of these types of debts. It is good to see some follow-up by the G8.

Some may argue that this is simply foolishness. After all, the argument goes, these countries have put themselves in these terrible positions of debt and simply relieving them of their debt will not really make any difference. Of course, it will make a difference. And the circumstances which surround the incurring of their debt do not have as much to do with the fact that this debt is choking off their future. In some cases, the corrupt government which ran up the debt is no longer in power, and the government in place is left holding the bag.

Will these nations simply run up another huge debt? This is a possibility, but it would be hoped that the NGOs which are holding the purse strings, primarily the African Development Bank, IMF, and the World Bank, would be wary of handing out risky loans again to these nations. In addition, the possibility of running up a future debt should not dissuade us from forgiving an existing debt. In spiritual terms, we would all be in trouble if God would only forgive us, if it was certain that we would never sin again. (See the parable of the man forgiven a large debt in Luke 18:23-35.)

Posted by David at 3:45 AM  |  Comments (0)  | Link

Tuesday, June 14, 2005
Additions to Priests for Life Staff  

Fr. Pavone announces that his staff is growing. First, he is joined by Fr. Mark Clarke, CMF from California. Then he writes:
We have also just received word that another diocesan priest has been released to work with us -- but I have to let him tell his parish before I announce it to you. And a third diocesan priest has also heard that he will likely be released to work with us full-time, and I'll tell you about him when he gets his official letter.
I think that the first priest he mentioned was later announced here to be Fr. Giacomo Capoverdi from Rhode Island. If not then, there are two more priests expected to join Priests for Life.

Thank God for Priests for Life. It certainly is an inspiration to us all to be more active in our pro-life efforts. As is obvious from these new staff members, the Lord is calling priests to help lead the pro-life work. The growth of this ministry and the new society of priests for life certainly seem to be an indication of where the Holy Spirit is at work today.

Posted by David at 6:45 AM  |  Comments (0)  | Link

Monday, June 13, 2005
Feast of St. Anthony of Padua  

St. Anthony of Padua

St. Anthony of the Friars Minor is a testimony to the fact that God's ways are not our ways. The man who was known as the "Hammer of Heretics" was hardly a physically impressive specimen. St. Anthony was short and squat and quiet and reserved. However, when he preached, he spoke with an eloquence and learning that moved hardened hearts to be converted. God used this Doctor of the Church to bring about many changes of heart throughout his short life that ended at age 36.

St. Anthony did not start out as a preacher, an Italian, or even a Franciscan. God kept redirecting St. Anthony's life in order that He might more fully use this gifted and holy man. St. Anthony was born Ferdinand de Bulhoes in Lisbon, Portugal in 1195. Although his parents desired that he be a nobleman, he entered the regular canons of St. Augustine at age 15. During his eight years as an Augustinian, he quietly studied and memorized Scripture and the Early Church Fathers. Upon seeing the bodies of five martyred Franciscan missionaries who were killed in Morocco, he was moved to join the Franciscans in order to become a missionary.

His attempt at missionary work failed when he became deathly ill soon after his arrival in Morocco in 1221. Instead he wound up in Italy where he met St. Francis of Assisi at a general meeting of the Friars Minor. He was assigned to the hermitage St. Paul near Forli where he served doing menial tasks including washing the dishes.

His quiet and reserved ways could only hide his gifts for so long as the Lord desired to use him in many powerful ways. When no one was prepared to give the speech following an ordination in Forli, St. Anthony was asked to speak however the Holy Spirit moved him. His initial reticence finally gave way, and he spoke letting the Holy Spirit guide him. His manner of speaking and his beautiful teaching on Scripture and the Fathers aroused considerable interest in the dish washing brother. Word got out and eventually the regional superior assigned St. Anthony to preach throughout Northern Italy.

The crowds packed into parishes and squares to hear the eloquence of St. Anthony. God powerfully worked through his gifts of oratory and learning as hearts were converted. Heretics repented of their sins. The rich and the powerful were moved to give generously and renounce lives of sin. Eventually, although concerned that the brothers would let learning for learning's sake replace devotion, St. Francis assigned St. Anthony to teach theology to the brothers. In the last five years of his life, St. Anthony resided in Padua where his preaching led to the reform of persons and laws.

He died in 1231. He was canonized on May 30, 1232 by Pope Gregory IX, and he was proclaimed a Doctor of the Church by Pius XII on January 16, 1946.

The link leads to information on St. Anthony's sermons.

Posted by David at 1:15 AM  |  Comments (0)  | Link

Sunday, June 12, 2005
Shepherds Needed  

When He saw the crowds, He had compassion for them, because they were harassed and helpless, like sheep without a shepherd. Then He said to His disciples, "The harvest is plentiful, but the laborers are few; pray therefore the Lord of the harvest to send out laborers into His harvest." And He called to Him His twelve disciples and gave them authority over unclean spirits, to cast them out, and to heal every disease and ever infirmity. (Mt. 9:36-10:1)
Jesus has compassion on the crowds because they are like sheep without a shepherd. The people do not know where to go. They are not being led. Consequently, they are harassed and helpless. Just like sheep who do not have a good shepherd to guide them to where they should go.

It is interesting to note that it is not here that Jesus speaks of His being the Good Shepherd. (He does in John 10.) Instead He turns to His disciples telling them that the harvest is plentiful and they should pray for the Lord to send out laborers to bring in the harvest. Perhaps some of the disciples (and these are all those who are following Jesus, not just the twelve) said a quick prayer. Jesus answers any prayers that were said by choosing the Twelve to be laborers in the harvest. In other words, he provides the people with shepherds and harvesters by appointing the Twelve to be shepherds for the people. They are to go out in His name because He gives them His authority to cast out unclean spirits and to heal diseases.

Today we seem to have the same problem that Jesus found in first century Israel--sheep without shepherds. Yes, we have shepherds, but as at any time, we have shepherds who are not shepherding the sheep (see Ezekial 34). The present crisis has been seen before, and it will be seen again until the end of time. Fr. John Neuhaus has indicated that the present crisis in the Church is a crisis of fidelity. I agree with that assessment, but I would add, based on this passage from Scripture, that the present crisis is a crisis or prayer. "Pray therefore the Lord of the harvest to send out laborers into His harvest" (Lk. 9:38).

In God's providence, He wants us to pray for the laborers. Yes, this passage can be interpreted on a more a universal basis because, indeed, we are all called to be laborers for Christ. However, the context is very clear that Jesus is concerned about shepherds and harvesters who are to be appointed by Him to serve among the sheep and to gather in the Lord's harvest. Jesus is calling us to pray for the servant-leaders of His Church. We must pray for those whom God has appointed, and we must pray for the Lord to continue to send laborers to gather in the harvest.

Much ink has been spilled in detailing the problems surrounding the sexual scandals of the clergy in the United States and in other countries. I am not suggesting that the truth should not be made known. I am suggesting that those who find this the most troubling, and that should be all who are part of Holy Mother Church, should be praying the most for the Lord to act through those who are His appointed shepherds and to continue to provide holy men (and yes, there are holy men who are serving the Church) to be the bishops and priests of the Church. St. Benedict's order has the motto Ora et Labora. It is worth noting that the in the order it is presented ora comes before labora.

Posted by David at 9:00 AM  |  Comments (0)  | Link

Saturday, June 11, 2005
The Sin that Condemns  

In each of our lives there will come dark times. Times so bleak that we really are not sure how we will even consider what is the next step to be taken. Perhaps the worst of these times is the one for which we are the most responsible. It is not that events have happened, and we are trying to respond. Instead, we have made a choice which we expressed with our words or our deeds, and the result of our choice has been disastrous. In other words, we have put ourselves in the pit, and we are groping for the way out.

Judas found himself in such a spot. He who had been specifically chosen by our Lord to be one of the Twelve had made a conscious choice to betray our Lord to the religious authorities. Why had he decided to do this, is not necessarily clear. Of course, one theory is that he simply was not able to resist the payment of thirty pieces of silver. We know that he was greedy because Scripture records that he used to take from the band of disciples' money bag which had been entrusted to him. Others try to give Judas a more complex motivation by indicating that he acted in order to force our Lord's hand. The idea is that Judas wanted the kingdom of God to begin with Jesus' earthly overthrow of the Romans. If he placed Jesus in position where He must act, perhaps He would start the rebellion and give up this humble ministry of healing and preaching. This seems a bit contrived, but perhaps it does help us to understand that there might have been more to his thinking than simply a desire to get rich at the expense of our Lord.

Whatever the reason that Judas betrayed our Lord, he had done it. Following his evil action, his conscience begins to bother him, and he begins to realize what he has done. He has closely observed our Lord for three years. He knows that Jesus had done nothing wrong. Jesus certainly was not guilty of anything that deserved death.

Judas' response is to try to rid himself of the sin he has committed. He confesses rightly that he is guilty of betraying innocent blood (Mt. 27:4). He tries to clear himself by returning the money. However, this does not work to deal with his guilt, and he goes out and hangs himself. Why did this happen? Did he not confess his sin?

The problem is that Judas despaired. He did not believe that he could be forgiven for the grievous sin he had committed. It was not enough to recognize that he had betrayed Jesus who is perfectly innocent. He needed to have the hope that God would forgive Him of even this most abominable sin.

Similarly for us, we must not despair even when we have done what appears to be unforgivable. For when we despair, we believe that God's mercy cannot act in our lives. We place ourselves outside of the love that God longs to give us if we are willing to repent and trust that He will forgive us.

Otherwise we will have committed the sin that cannot be forgiven in this world or the next. That is the power of the free will that God has given us. We can choose not to believe in His infinite mercy. When we do so, we condemn ourselves. If you are not in despair now, it seems ridiculous that anyone would refuse such great mercy and forgiveness. The key seems to be not to forget His love when we feel least able to receive it.

Posted by David at 9:15 AM  |  Comments (0)  | 

Friday, June 10, 2005
Devotion to the Sacred Heart: Conversion and Reparation  

As the month of June, which is dedicated to the Sacred Heart of Jesus, continues, I am adding the last in the installment of sections from Directory on Popular Piety and the Liturgy regarding devotion to the Sacred Heart:
Devotion to the Sacred Heart is a wonderful historical expression of the Church's piety for Christ, her Spouse and Lord: it calls for a fundamental attitude of conversion and reparation, of love and gratitude, apostolic commitment and dedication to Christ and his saving work. For these reasons, the devotion is recommended and its renewal encouraged by the Holy See and by the Bishops. Such renewal touches on the devotion's linguistic and iconographic expressions; on consciousness of its biblical origins and its connection with the great mysteries of the faith; on affirming the primacy of the love of God and neighbour as the essential content of the devotion itself. Directory on Popular Piety and the Liturgy, 172
This section makes the point of how devotion to the Sacred Heart should impact what our fundamental attitude is. It should be one of conversion and reparation. In other words our devotion to the Sacred Heart of Christ should move us to recognize how we have wounded the Heart of Jesus. In realizing what we have done to bring sorrow to His Heart, we ought to be moved to change and make reparation for our sins.

Part of the Biblical basis for devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus is found in St. John's Gospel where the Evangelist records that when the soldier found that Jesus had already died on the cross, he pierced His side with a spear (Jn 19:33-37). From the side of Christ flowed blood and water. St. John goes to great pains to indicate that he witnessed this event. The Church has always recognized that the blood and water represent the sacraments of the Eucharist and Baptism. Note, how these flow from the Heart of Christ. What is Baptism but a conversion. Jesus' Heart longs for the conversion of sinners which includes sins being absolved. Baptism is the Sacrament that absolves sin and brings the sinner into the Church.

Also, from the Heart of the Crucified Lord flows the Eucharist. Jesus' gift of Himself in the Eucharist flows from His Sacred Heart. The reparation of sin is fueled by the grace of Christ's holy sacrifice for our sins. Being absolved of sin, we are able to receive our Lord in the Eucharist. Through the Eucharist, we are moved to perform acts of reparation for our sins. We are sent out from Mass to serve. We are also sent out to make reparation for sin--our own and the sins of others. If we truly receive our Lord when we receive communion, than we must out of love for him be willing to make small sacrifices for Him. My lack of willingness to make these small sacrifices must be overcome by a greater devotion to the Heart from which comes such love. Love that longs to bring us into the fold of His Church which is His Bride. This is also the love that longs for us to remain with Him by receiving Him in Holy Communion. These sacraments of initiation are sources of grace from which we must draw during our entire life in order that we may persevere until the end.

Posted by David at 2:00 AM  |  Comments (0)  | Link

Thursday, June 09, 2005
The Patriarch Joseph as a Type for Christ  

One of the interesting parts of the story of the life of Joseph the Patriarch (Genesis 37-50) is how his life is a type for Christ. Of course, the entire Old Testament points to Christ, and we are to read it in light of Him. The many figures whose lives are recounted are types for Christ, and they help us to better understand some aspect of who our Lord is. For instance, Moses prefigures Jesus as the new lawgiver who presents the Sermon on the Mount as the new Moses.

Joseph prefigures Christ who saves His people through suffering. In the beginning of his story, we find Joseph, through a couple of dreams, presented with some inkling of what will happen in his life. Then his life takes a serious turn for the worse when all of his ten older brothers agree to first kill him. Later, they decide to sell him into slavery instead because it would not be so messy.

After being sold into slavery, Joseph is taken from the land of Canaan and sold again to an Egyptian official. Joseph undergoes years of suffering in Egypt. Although he initially finds favor with his Egyptian master because of his abilities to manage his master's household, he winds up in jail after being falsely accused of going after his master's wife.

Again in jail, Joseph finds favor. In this case, the jailer recognizes his management and people skills and puts him in charge of all of the rest of the prisoners. He interprets the dreams of the Pharaoh's butler and baker who had found themselves in the prison. The baker is executed as Joseph indicated by the interpretation of his dream. And the butler is restored to his position in accordance with Joseph's interpretation of his dream.

Years go by as Joseph languishes in jail. It would be very easy to expect him to become bitter and disappointed. Far from his homeland, without a sense that anyone from his family even knows he is alive, he is wasting his life in a prison.

Finally, as you know, through the butler's recommendation, he interprets the dreams of Pharaoh which predict seven years of agricultural abundance followed by seven years of famine. Since dream interpretation was considered a divine gift given to wise people, the Pharaoh appoints Joseph to administer a program to handle this coming crisis.

As much in life comes full circle, in one form or another, Joseph's brothers reappear in his life. During the regional famine, the brothers have come from Canaan to get grain in Egypt which has stores of grain due to Joseph's plan to save the people by storing up the additional grain during the seven years of abundance.

This is where the story becomes very interesting. Joseph receives his brothers. He does not turn them away. He also provides them with grain. However, he also is used by God to teach the brothers a lesson and to bring about their true reconciliation. Through a series of events orchestrated by Joseph, the brothers end up offering themselves to be Joseph's slaves. In the midst of these events, the brothers recognize that they are experiencing retribution for having sold Joseph into slavery although they do not yet realize that they are dealing with Joseph himself. Finally, Joseph identifies himself to his brothers, forgives them, and has his family, including is father, move to Egypt.

In understanding Joseph as a type of Christ, we see that like our Lord he was falsely accused and sentenced, he was tempted but did not sin, he was envied, he suffered patiently, he forgave his enemies, and he saved his people. He also is an example of admonishing the sinner.

When the brothers came to Egypt and Joseph recognized them, he did not run over to them and start hugging every one of them in a family reunion. Instead, he actually is fairly rough on them in a couple of their visits to Egypt which took place over a number of years. He does this because it brings them to a point of repentance and conversion after they examine their consciences. Our Lord does the same with us.

When we are walking in sin, Jesus calls us to conversion. He does not run over and start acting chummy with us as if there is no issue between the two of us. Instead, He wants us to realize what we have done and how it has damaged the relationship we have with Him. He brings about all kinds of circumstances to get us to that point of amendment of life. We would rather not experience the circumstances. We want the false friendship we would have if Jesus acted as if nothing had happened between us. The key is to come to the point, as Joseph's brothers did, of recognizing the problem and making a change by repenting and returning to God.

Posted by David at 8:45 AM  |  Comments (0)  | 

Wednesday, June 08, 2005
Archbishop Foley: Internet is the Areopagus of Our Time  

Archbishop John Foley, president of the Pontifical Council for Social Communications, recognized the need for the Church to evangelize via the Internet:
If it is possible to find God on the Internet, then the Church has the obligation to proclaim him in that medium, says a Vatican official.

He told a meeting today: "The Internet can be a new path to God, a call to the Church to question itself on the opportunities offered by the new media to inform, educate, pray and evangelize, to take the Word of God everywhere, to reach also those who live in solitude and who perhaps would never open the door to their home."

"The Church, as transmitter of the Revelation of God, has the task to communicate the Word and must encourage the use of Internet for the common good, the development of peace and justice, in respect of personal dignity and with a spirit of solidarity," he pointed out.

Internet is "the Areopagus of our time, the instrument to spread the Christian message," Archbishop Foley said. "But it is necessary to educate in its use, as with every reality that surrounds us, the positive element is opposed to the negative, creating confusion and false values.

"Yes, God can be found on the network. And among the millions of people who surf the Internet every day, many may find words of hope, come across other cultural and spiritual experiences, bringing down ideological barriers to discover new horizons."
I appreciate the Archbishop's comments. I believe that many a blogger understands that the Internet is a powerful medium for evangelization.

Of course, I appreciate almost everything that the Archbishop says. I have very fond memories of him from a number of years ago. Long before I was Catholic, I would hear him give the commentary during the Christmas Eve Mass from St. Peter's which was broadcast on PBS. The fact that I would watch the mass was a strange thing in itself given my very non-Catholic upbringing, but I enjoyed watching what I did not understand and I was fond of John Paul the Great as far as I understood who he was. Little did I know that God was planting seeds through the Archbishop's words. This is exactly what happens through the Internet. Seeds of evangelization are planted. Eventually from these seeds God produces beautiful fruit.

Posted by David at 12:58 AM  |  Comments (0)  | Link

Tuesday, June 07, 2005
Homily Surprises  

[I was planning on writing this entry on the homily I heard this weekend. Before beginning to write the entry, I saw Amy Welborn's (Open Book) entry on preaching (See link below) which only provided me with further impetus to write this.]

My family and I went to the vigil mass on Saturday. The guest celebrant priest is Dominican who looks at bit like Bernard Cardinal Law. However, I was dumbfounded when I heard him preach because he spoke on one topic I had never heard a Catholic priest address (I have never heard in-person; I am not considering EWTN.), and in the course of his homily he mentioned another word that I might have heard once since I began going to mass.

First, the priest spoke on the reality of the existence of the devil. He then went on to explain how the devil tempts us to sin. It was a breath of fresh air to hear someone speak about something of importance related to our spiritual life. Speaking about the reality of the devil and the possibility that we might by tempted him was enough to place this homily in a category of its own among Catholic sermons I personally have heard.

However, the information was also very useful. The priest described how no matter what state we might find ourselves in, we are vulnerable to the wiles of the devil. When I am down, he wants to discourage me by tempting me to think that God could care less about me. When I am up, he wants me to believe that I do not need God. And most of all, he wants me to believe that he does not exist because then I will not see the need to ask for God's protection and grace.

In the midst of this, the priest mentioned a word I have rarely heard from a Catholic priest (Again with the exception of priests on EWTN). That word is confession. In the years since I began attending mass prior to my entry into the fullness of faith over four years ago, I think that I have heard the word confession mentioned perhaps twice in the homilies I have heard. For obvious reasons, this is quite a shame. The Catholic Faith is a sacramental faith. It is through the seven sacraments which Christ instituted that we receive His grace. For adults, confession is the means by which we are able to be absolved of our serious sins. There simply is no other way.

Although the priest did not make the connection, I think it is appropriate to link the lack of teaching about confession and the lack of teaching about the reality of the devil. They really are the same thing. Both are a denial of sin. If there is no such thing as sin or mortal sin is almost impossible to commit, than it is obvious that there is no need for confession. Similarly, if the devil is just a piece of fairy tale left over to help the weak-minded, than ultimately there is no sin. In both cases, the denial of Church teaching leads to the same thing: a weakening of the resolve to grow in holiness. The fruit of frequent confession is a growth in holiness because I become more cooperative with the grace Christ gives me in the sacrament. Similarly, as I recognize the reality of evil that enters my life, I learn to turn to God more in order to fight against evil.

Posted by David at 1:00 PM  |  Comments (0)  | Link

Sunday, June 05, 2005
Support All who promote the Culture of Life  

Fr. Frank Pavone, in his bi-weekly column, emphasizes the idea that although officially the two major political parties in the United States have completely opposite platform positions on abortion, it is the position of the individual candidate that matters:
The commitment to defend the weakest and most vulnerable human beings does not arise from a political party or platform, nor from any kind of personal or communal agenda. Nor does it arise from bishops, priests, or pastors. Rather, it arises from our humanity itself, fashioned as it is by the hand of God. God, who is life, writes upon our hearts its value, and He bestows on us both the gift of life and the privilege and duty to defend it. Nobody needs any kind of permission to defend life, nor can anyone excuse himself from that duty. Nobody has a monopoly on the defense of life, nor is the pro-life task a means to an end. Defending life is an end in itself, and has in itself all the justification it ever
needs.
As we know, there are pro-life Democrats, and there are pro-abortion Republicans. Those who are pro-life, no matter what party affiliation, should be supported, and those who are pro-abortion, no matter what party affiliation, should be encouraged to change their position.
My own observation about Catholics and party affiliation is that there is strong tendency for Catholics to place their party affiliation ahead of their Faith. The ones who identify themselves as Democrats often have a family history of Democrat party affiliation which leads them to support pro-abortion Democrats despite this obvious conflict with the Church's clear teaching against abortion. More often than not it seems that these Democrat Catholics do not even consider the abortion question in their political calculus either out of naivete or a wholesale acceptance of the package of lies that have been promulgated by the abortion industry. Their focus is on other traditional Democratic positions which arguably are much more in line with Catholic teaching than the Republican positions.

On the other side of the fence, I find that the Catholics who identify themselves as Republicans tend to proudly note that for the most part, Republican candidates are at least in official position pro-life. These Catholics often ignore the many other positions which the Republican candidates have which are out of step with Catholic teaching. Also, there is a certain degree that these Republican Catholics embrace the Republican party more for its traditional economic positions than for its positions on life. In other words, they really want to be Republicans, and thank goodness the Republicans have the better end of the life issues so they can look orthodox while maintaining their preferred party affiliation.

The fact is that many pro-life Republicans are only mildly pro-life. They hold a pro-life position on many issues because it is politically expedient to do so; it is not a deep conviction of their own. Evidence for this is found when the life issue becomes complex, such as embryonic stem cell research. The fact that there is no long history of debate in this country about the complex issues of life means that for the politician it is not easy to see where the political battle lines are drawn on these complex issues. Abortion is easy because there has been debate about this for decades. Consequently, you see pro-life politicians supporting embryonic stem cell research without understanding how naive, if not hypocritical such support is given their "clear" stand against abortion. Unfortunately, these politicians often lack the understanding of why abortion is wrong. They understand that it is taking life which is wrong, but they do not have the full understanding that human life starts at conception. Consequently, anything but protection of human life beginning with conception is wrong.

The problem is that there are years of misinformation to overcome. The Roe vs. Wade decision set in motion a whole slew of efforts that have changed the climate in the United States into what John Paul the Great called the Culture of Death. Reversing that atmosphere of lies is the true effort of the pro-life movement.

Posted by David at 7:30 AM  |  Comments (0)  | Link

Saturday, June 04, 2005
The Feast of the Immaculate Heart of Mary  

Immaculate Heart of Mary

Today the Church celebrates the feast of the Immaculate Heart of Mary. The Scriptural basis for devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary is beautiful and profound. Primarily, it is St. Luke who wanting "to write an orderly account" (1:3) concerning the faith has given us the picture of our Lady's heart.

First, near the conclusion of the account of the nativity of our Lord (2:1-20), St. Luke writes, "But Mary kept all these things, pondering them in her heart." (2:19) Surely, she meditates upon all that has happened to her surrounding the birth of her child. From the angel Gabriel's announcement to her that she, as a Virgin, would give birth to the Messiah (1:26-38) to her visit with her cousin Elizabeth who declares that Mary is the mother of God when she hears Mary's greeting to her (1:39-56), there is much upon which she could ponder. Now, she has been providentially brought to the city of David to give birth to her precious son in a cave. Shepherds make their way to this cave to declare that angels have told them about His birth, and they have come to see what the Lord had made known to them.

Through this pondering in her heart, Mary grew closer to God. Her meditation would only increase the awe she felt for the God who was so wonderfully working in her life. As St. Ambrose wrote, "Even though she was Mother of the Lord, she wanted to learn his precepts, She, who had given birth to God, desired to know God still better." (De virginibus, 2, 6-16)

The second reference to Mary's heart is at the conclusion of the narrative on St. Joseph and our Lady's finding of our Lord in the Temple (2:41-52). Here again, St. Luke records that "His mother kept all these things in her heart". (2:51) She meditates again on the ways of the Lord which have her search for Jesus for three days only to find Him in the Temple with the teachers. Jesus' reply to His mother as to why He has disappeared for three days, is fruit for her meditation. Because Jesus makes clear to His parents that their parental role is under His Heavenly Father's authority over Him. However, as their son, He is subject to them, and he demonstrates this by His obedience to them (2:51).

Perhaps the most important indirect reference to our Lady's heart is in the prophecy of Simeon recorded in the Presentation account of St. Luke's Gospel (2:22-39). Simeon announces to our Lady and St. Joseph that, "a sword will pierce through [Mary's] own soul, also" She, too, will know the suffering that her Son will experience. Surely, she meditated on the amazing word which were spoken to her by Simeon. Over the years, she must have wondered what the exact meaning was for a sword to pierce in her soul. It is only at Calvary that she would fully understand the depth of what was prophesied so many years prior.

Throughout all three of these passages, Mary is the person who is pondering the mysteries of God. She dwells upon how the Almighty is working in her life. She is an active participant in God's plan, yet she, too, must meditate on what the Lord is doing. She would also simply meditate on who He is that would be born of a Virgin. Consequently, it is easy to understand how devotion to our Lady's Immaculate Heart would begin and grow. St. Luke recorded how her heart focused on the work of the Lord. This devotion teaches us that, led by our Lady's example, we too, should ponder in our hearts the work of the Lord.

Posted by David at 7:00 AM  |  Comments (0)  | 

Friday, June 03, 2005
Feast of the Sacred Heart of Jesus  

Sacred Heart of Jesus

On the Feast of the Sacred Heart of Jesus, I have included another section from the Directory on Popular Piety and the Liturgy:

Popular piety tends to associate a devotion with its iconographic expression. This is a normal and positive phenomenon. Inconveniences can sometimes arise: iconographic expressions that no longer respond to the artistic taste of the people can sometimes lead to a diminished appreciation of the devotion's object, independently of its theological basis and its historico-salvific content.

This can sometimes arise with devotion to the Sacred Heart: perhaps certain over sentimental images which are incapable of giving expression to the devotion's robust theological content or which do not encourage the faithful to approach the mystery of the Sacred Heart of our Saviour.

Recent time have seen the development of images representing the Sacred Heart of Jesus at the moment of crucifixion which is the highest expression of the love of Christ. The Sacred Heart is Christ crucified, his side pierced by the lance, with blood and water flowing from it (cf, John 19, 34).
Directory on Popular Piety and the Liturgy, 173
Truly, the image of our Lord crucified is an icon worthy of our meditation. Here the God-man has given Himself as the one, perfect sacrifice for our sins. The unblemished lamb who knew no sin has become sin in order that we might be saved from our sins.
Worthy is the Lamb that was slain
to receive power and riches
wisdom and strength,
honor and glory and praise.
Revelation 5:12
Before His Sacred Heart, which is pierced and from which flows water and His precious blood, we can only bow in adoration before our God. He is the One who has loved us so much that He took on flesh in order to offer it up for the sake of us who are sinners.

Posted by David at 1:45 AM  |  Comments (0)  | Link

Catholic Insider  

If you are not familiar with podcasting then you probably have not heard about the Catholic Insider. First, things first. For those who do not know what podcasting is, according to Wikipedia:
Podcasting is a way of publishing sound files to the Internet, allowing users to subscribe to a feed and receive new audio files automatically. Podcasting is distinct from other types of audio content delivery because it uses the RSS 2.0 file format. This technique has enabled many producers to create self-published, syndicated radio shows.

Users subscribe to podcasts using "podcatching" software (also called "aggregator" software) which periodically checks for and downloads new content. It can then sync the content to the user's portable music player, hence the portmanteau of Apple's "iPod" and "broadcasting". Podcasting does not require an iPod; any digital audio player or computer with the appropriate software can play podcasts.

Now that it is clear what podcasting is, what is the Catholic Insider? It is a podcast by Fr. Roderick Vonhaegen who is a Dutch priest of the Archdiocese of Utrecht, Netherlands. Although he hails from the Netherlands, he gets around. His most interesting podcasts wererecordedd during the time of the death of John Paul the Great, the Conclave, and the installation of Pope Benedict XVI. Not that his other podcasts which are not live from the Vatican City are not interesting, but it is tremendous experience to hear him share his observations while standing in St. Peter's Square as he cheers with the rest of the faithful when the "Habemus Papam" is announced.

In his podcasts, Fr. Roderick shares the Faith through this medium in a way that is winsome and beautifully sincere. On several podcasts, you can hear him huffing and puffing while the wheels of his bike turn as he describes the scenery while taking you along to another soundseeing tour. Perhaps Fr. Roderick is about to take you on a tour of a church with a distinctive history or maybe he lets you share an Easter celebration, including an Easter egg hunt for his nephew, with his family. He weaves the everyday items of life, including Dutch customs and practices, together with information on the Faith through history, practice, Tradition, and Magisterial teaching. Also, his podcasts often feature contemporary and classical music which helps to set the theme of the podcast.

In addition, to his podcast, Fr. Roderick has recently added the morning and evening prayers of the Divine Office. Like the podcasts, these can be received via a subscription which you access through a news aggregator. Or the files can be directly downloaded from his Web site. Either way, it is nice feature which can be added to your devotions through this new medium of podcasting. For more information, on the morning and evening prayer, click here.

Posted by David at 1:15 AM  |  Comments (0)  | Link

Thursday, June 02, 2005
Breakthrough in potential for adult stem cells  

For those who might have missed it (and I believe there were a number of us), an important story on adult stem cell research was quietly reported over two months ago. Unfortunately, the culture of death is more interested in perpetuating itself than in actually helping people. Thus, the apparent lack of fanfare for yet another example of the research on adult stem cells which is leading to real treatments that help people.
Potential seen in adult stem cells - Mar 21, 2005

Australian scientists have found that stem cells taken from adults could have the same life-saving potential as those taken from embryos, a discovery that could potentially end the contentious debate over embryonic research.

The results from the four-year project, at Australia's Griffith University in Queensland, show that adult stem cells harvested from the nose can be grown into virtually any kind of cell in the human body.

"Their other big advantage over embryonic stem cells is their potential for autologous therapies in which a patient's own cells are removed from the nose, grown and multiplied in a dish and transplanted back into the same patient which overcomes the issue of immune rejection or related immune-suppressing drug therapies," he said.

The Catholic Archbishop of Sydney, Cardinal George Pell, told The Australian newspaper that the research could provide a possible solution to the moral debate over embryonic research and said he would refer it to the Vatican.

The Catholic Church provided Aust. $50,000 ($39,000) in funding for the Griffith University project.


more >>

The article demonstrates the bias toward embryonic stem cells, as the opening paragraph slips in the line, "same life-saving potential as those taken from embryos". There is of course the potential for embryonic stem cells to do amazing things, but as of now, it is only theoretical. However, the list of actual benefits of adult stem cells continues to grow.

Hat tip Michael Dubriel

Posted by David at 6:45 AM  |  Comments (0)  | Link

Wednesday, June 01, 2005
The Holy Father's Prayer Intentions for June  

Missionary - For Christians: may they come to an ever deeper realization that the Most Holy Eucharist is the pulsing heart of the Church.

General - For the millions of refugees in the world: may they receive brotherly love and concrete aid from all Christians.

Posted by David at 3:05 AM  |  Comments (0)  | Link

A Year Later: Some Positive Change in My Diocese  

According to the Richmond Times Dispatch, during the year since his installation as the 12th bishop of the Diocese of Richmond (my diocese), the Most Rev. Francis X. DiLorenzo, has initiated some positive changes:

1) Re-established the diocese's liturgical commission to among other things investigate parishioners' complaints of liturgical abuse.
2) Appointed a diocesan theologian who is charged with approving parish requests for outside speakers.
3) Removed the sexual-minorities commission.
4) Increased the number of clustered parishes (one priest for two parishes).
5) Hired auditors to assist parishes and schools in checking the financial books.
6) Moved his residence from across the street from the cathedral to a suburb of Richmond some 25 minutes away. The three-story house is now used for diocesan offices which meant a $35,000/year rental of offices could be saved.

These are all very good changes. However, as one person in the news article indicates, I would like to see more rapid changes which rollback the damage done during his predecessor's 29 years and which encourage an active, orthodox faith in the diocese.

As a convert, I am somewhat ignorant of how a diocese is run, but I do know that my bishop is called to be a shepherd who leads his flock to Christ through His Church. He will be judged by our Lord on how he served. Exactly how he implements reforms and renewal is not as important. My calling is to pray for him and to support the orthodox practice of the Faith. On that I will be judged.

Hat tip to Michael Dubriel.

Posted by David at 3:00 AM  |  Comments (0)  | Link